The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

How and for what the director spent $ 80 thousand for ten seconds of shooting in New York

'21.04.2022'

Nadezhda Verbitskaya

Subscribe to ForumDaily NewYork on Google News

A huge amount of money was spent on a 10-second frame of the film just because the director did not want to use a “hackneyed” angle. It was on the set of Bonfire of the Vanities (1990) in an era when Hollywood was still willing to spend a lot of money on "simple" movies - without special effects, superheroes and everything else, the author writes. Levi's blog.

This is a shot of a landing plane. It would seem that there is such a thing? We have seen landing planes hundreds of times in the movies! But that was the rub.

According to the scenario of "Bonfire of the Vanities", at the very beginning of the film, one of the main characters of the picture flies to New York. Usually, if a character in a movie arrives in a city, the filmmakers show it with a frame of a landing plane. Even then, in 1990, such a shot was already quite clichéd in films.

The Bonfire of the Vanities was directed by Brian de Palma. By that time, he had a rich collection of works behind him, including such blockbusters as Scarface and The Untouchables.
De Palma did not shoot beaten shots and did not want any landing planes for his picture. But the director of the second crew, Eric Schwab, had an idea to film a plane landing in a unique way. So that even the very picky de Palma could not fail to include it in his picture!

De Palma did not believe his colleague, and the men made a $100 bet whether Schwab could film a landing plane so cool that the shot would be included in the final cut of the film. This argument seems to be unfair. After all, de Palma had the opportunity to decide what was included in the film and what was not! But Schwab decided that de Palma would make a decision that was beneficial to the final quality of the picture. They agreed on one condition: the aircraft that will be shown in the frame must be a supersonic Concorde to match the status of the character.

Of all the supersonic aircraft projects, the European Concorde proved to be the most successful. Although the USSR began using the Tu-144 in 1975, it was removed from passenger flights three years later. Concorde, on the other hand, made regular transatlantic flights for almost 20 years. However, due to the high cost of operation, tickets for it were sold only in first class, so only the most successful people could afford to fly it.

It was this plane that was supposed to land in the frame. Schwab set to work. He wanted to shoot a landing liner against the backdrop of the setting sun and the Empire State Building. To do this, he had to move the camera further from the runway and use very powerful telephoto lenses.

But he had a problem. It was necessary that the sun set exactly in a straight line between the runway and the legendary skyscraper, located 20 km from the airport. Using a special computer (they were a rarity in 1990), Schwab learned that the picture he wanted was only possible for 30 seconds a year - right before sunset on June 12th.

Flights from Europe that were served by Concordes did not land at such times. Therefore, filmmakers had to negotiate with AirFrance to take one of their planes into the sky without passengers. And then they planted him at the right time. Schwab's film crew used five cameras to film this landing the first time. And they succeeded.

The film company spent $80 to film 000 seconds of the Concorde landing against the backdrop of sunset. Adjusted for inflation, that's over $30 in today's dollars. As a result, the frame turned out to be so unusual that de Palma could not help but insert it into the final version of the “Bonfire of the Vanities”. From the entire film of the plane landing, he used a 170-second fragment. And Schwab, having spent that kind of money (it's good that it wasn't his own!), won a $000 bet.

However, the picture failed miserably at the box office. It is still considered one of the director's worst films. But what a magnificent shot, what a story!

Subscribe to ForumDaily NewYork on Google News
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By: XYZScripts.com